This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor.—
The use of tobacco in any form—chewing, snuffing, or smoking—as detrimental to health, was known a long time ago. It was usually found to be repulsive to others when done in their presence. The question arose early in history, whether the smoker should be punished for what he did to himself and to others.Tobacco smoking in Japan was a well-established habit in 1595. In 1603, it was forbidden by the state, to no avail. Then, in 1612, it was decreed that if one was caught even just selling tobacco, all his property was to be confiscated. In 1604, King James I of England called smoking "barbarous, beastly, hateful to the nose, a vile and stinking custom, harmful to the brain, dangerous to the lungs." But he does not seem to have requested any punishment; the king trusted that his word alone would be followed. He who
Kassel V. The Penalty for Smoking. JAMA. 1974;227(8):941. doi:10.1001/jama.1974.03230210051020
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: