To the Editor.—
During the past 15 years, I have been involved in the screening of relatives of patients with malignant hyperthermia, and, therefore, I became increasingly aware of the inappropriateness of the term "malignant hyperthermia." Hence, I proposed a new, more descriptive term that, rather, is based on the pathological findings: acute familial peranesthetic rhabdomyolysis. This classification conveys the pathoetiologic signs and the treatment aspects to all physicians at once.Further arguments in favor of this term are as follows: (1) The word "malignant" is often misconstrued by the patients and affected relatives as meaning a carcinomatous tumor. As a result, many potential carriers of this anomaly declined evaluation of their genetic defect. Furthermore, insurance policies were turned down as a result. (2) Before the occurrence of this name for the syndrome, the mortality was indeed high, justifying the term "malignant." But now the survival rate has been greatly
Zsigmond EK. Malignant Hyperthermia— A Misnomer. JAMA. 1980;243(6):513. doi:10.1001/jama.1980.03300320011002
Browse and subscribe to JAMA Network podcasts!
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: