[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 10, 1989

The Limited Reliability of Physical Signs for Estimating Hemodynamics in Chronic Heart Failure

Author Affiliations

From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles.

From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles.

JAMA. 1989;261(6):884-888. doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03420060100040
Abstract

The cardiovascular physical examination is used commonly as a basis for diagnosis and therapy in chronic heart failure, although the relationship between physical signs, increased ventricular filling pressure, and decreased cardiac output has not been established for this population. We prospectively compared physical signs with hemodynamic measurements in 50 patients with known chronic heart failure (ejection fraction,.18±.06). Rales, edema, and elevated mean jugular venous pressure were absent in 18 of 43 patients with pulmonary capillary wedge pressures greater than or equal to 22 mm Hg, for which the combination of these signs had 58% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Proportional pulse pressure correlated well with cardiac index (r=.82), and when less than 25% pulse pressure had 91% sensitivity and 83% specificity for a cardiac index less than 2.2 L/min/m2. In chronic heart failure, reliance on physical signs for elevated ventricular filling pressure might result in inadequate therapy. Conversely, the adequacy of cardiac output is assessed reliably by pulse pressure. Our results facilitate decisions regarding treatment in chronic heart failure.

(JAMA 1989;261:884-888)

×