[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.203.245.76. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 20, 1982

Differential Diagnosis in Dermatopathology

JAMA. 1982;248(7):881. doi:10.1001/jama.1982.03330070069045

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

The newest publication by Dr Ackerman has many pluses and a few significant negatives. The biggest plus is the quality of printing, which provides excellent color rendition of representative microscopic sections. Such quality costs, as evidenced by the purchase price ($86) of this somewhat small text.

Selection of material varies in its usefulness. Among the most useful topics covered are comparisons of the psoriasiform dermatoses and of microscopic aspects of the various alopecias (both scarring and nonscarring). The section on tumors (malignant and benign) is somewhat patchy and often reflects Ackerman's bias, which differs from other authors of dermatopathology texts. Some entries appear of dubious value because of the minimal likelihood of difficulty in clinical differentiation, eg, porokeratosis v eccrine poroma, arthropod bites v chronic urticaria, irritant v allergic contact dermatitis, and in most instances comparisons of erythema nodosum and nodular vasculitis. In many of these cases, biopsies are rare

×