This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Dr Orient is correct in stating that Dr Gofman has assisted some antinuclear groups and that his tentative conclusions regarding the risk from ionizing radiation to man postulate that risk as somewhat greater than do those proposed by some expert committees. Perhaps I was remiss in not emphasizing this so that persons with strong preformed opinions could avoid the book. It is my opinion that the uncertainties surrounding the risks of low-level radiation are sufficiently great as to encompass both those cited by Orient and by Gofman.Gofman was careful to point out where he had to make assumptions and when his results disagreed with those of other authorities. He was careful to point out why his results differed from those given by others, leaving the reader in a good position to judge for himself. Gofman's assumptions were carefully spelled out, so that any reader could substitute his
Archer VE. Radiation and Human Health-Reply. JAMA. 1982;248(10):1180. doi:10.1001/jama.1982.03330100019016
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: