[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
December 3, 1982

Evaluation of Kidney Morphology

JAMA. 1982;248(21):2837. doi:10.1001/jama.1982.03330210029025

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor.—  In response to a question from a New York physician regarding contraindications and risks of retrograde pyelography as a first procedure in a patient with toxic drug reaction to the kidneys, the responding consultant, Chester C. Winter, MD (1982;247:2152), did not make a comment on retrograde pyelography in that particular clinical situation. The procedure was done on the patient to rule out obstructive uropathy. As stated by Dr Winter, retrograde pyelography is associated with considerable risks, both of the procedure itself and the associated anesthesia. Some of the risks are serious. A renal ultrasonogram, with modernday equipment and technical and interpretive expertise, has been shown to be a sensitive method by which obstructive uropathy can be ruled out. Moreover, it is a noninvasive method without associated risks from surgical procedure and anesthesia. It is also cheaper and less time consuming than retrograde pyelography. In the opinion of