[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
March 25, 1983

Oral Contraceptives The Good News

Author Affiliations

The University of North Carolina School of Public Health Chapel Hill

JAMA. 1983;249(12):1624-1625. doi:10.1001/jama.1983.03330360064039

After 20 years of marketing in the United States, sufficient time has elapsed to evaluate the possibility of long-term adverse and beneficial effects of oral contraceptives (OCs). As pharmacologic agents, their early complications have been studied intensively. The cardiovascular complications were established in Britain within eight years of their market introduction and widespread acceptance.1 These adverse effects appeared somewhat less devastating when balanced in perspective with the risks associated with pregnancy and delivery. Before age 35 years, pregnancy- and delivery-related mortality exceeded mortality from OC use by more than tenfold. However, the picture was not complete in the minds of many. There lingered a concern that the steroid hormone composition of OCs would increase the frequency of cancer after enough time had elapsed. How long is enough is always uncertain. Some exposures have been associated with an increased risk of specific cancer types within five years. More commonly, 15