This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
The author's remarks reveal a fundamental misconception of the purpose of the LAW AND MEDICINE features published by The Journal. These articles are not intended to provide a forum for expression of personal viewpoints or opinions of their authors but rather "to keep [JAMA] readers abreast of what the courts are doing in matters that affect the lives and interests of physicians" (emphasis mine) (1982; 248:473). Accordingly, the "journalistic tone" of these features is, and should be, one of balanced objectivity, not critical advocacy on behalf of one viewpoint over another. Due allowance is made by the editors of JAMA for publication of statements of editorial opinion in a form and manner in which they may clearly be recognized as such.The author's observation that the interests of the individual physician often do not coincide with those of the hospital is hardly open to controversy. The LAW AND
Tabor WJ. The Battle for Hospital Privileges-Reply. JAMA. 1983;250(7):899–900. doi:10.1001/jama.1983.03340070017015
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: