IS VENTRICULAR ectopy always a manifestation of a disease process or can it be found in normal persons? When present, should ventricular ectopy always be treated? To answer these questions, one must delve into medical history, a history rich in anecdote and opinion but muddled in its distinction between disease and health. We review herein the historical development of knowledge about, and attitudes toward, ventricular ectopy, the recent reports delineating patients with ventricular ectopy into prognostically different subsets, and the current approach to the treatment of patients with ventricular ectopy.
Although the art of palpating the pulse was practiced as early as 500 BC in ancient China,1 it was not until the second century BC that Herophilus described what we now recognize as extrasystoles.2 However, writers after Herophilus did not make reference to extrasystoles per se but rather talked about the "intermittent pulse." The most influential
Horan MJ, Kennedy HL. Ventricular Ectopy: History, Epidemiology, and Clinical Implications. JAMA. 1984;251(3):380–386. doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03340270058028
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: