[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.239.150.22. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 17, 1984

Midtrimester Abortion: Intra-amniotic Instillation of Hyperosmolar Urea and Prostaglandin F2α v Dilatation and Evacuation

Author Affiliations

From the Division of Reproductive Health, Center for Health Promotion and Education, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta.

JAMA. 1984;251(7):916-919. doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03340310030014
Abstract

Although dilatation and evacuation (D&E) is currently the most common method of midtrimester abortion in the United States, the intra-amniotic instillation of hyperosmolar urea and prostaglandin F combined (U-P) has been proposed as a safer technique. To evaluate the comparative safety of U-P and D&E, we analyzed 2,805 U-P and 9,572 D&E abortions at 13 to 24 menstrual weeks' gestation. The U-P procedure resulted in significantly more serious complications than D&E (1.03 v 0.49 per 100 abortions). After adjusting for patient age, race, parity, follow-up information, and preexisting conditions, the relative risk of serious complications associated with U-P was 1.9 (95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.1). This advantage for D&E stems from its applicability to the 13- to 16-week interval. Although D&E appears to be safer overall in the midtrimester, for women obtaining abortion after 16 weeks, the rates of serious complications were comparable, with a relative risk of 1.0 (95% confidence interval, 0.4 to 2.5).

(JAMA 1984;251:916-919)

×