This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
This book uses the issue of maternal-infant bonding to illustrate what is now a truism in the sociology of medicine, but one that cannot be repeated enough: often ideology is more critical than data in both popular and scientific acceptance of certain research findings.
A decade ago Stephen Jay Gould offered a thorough and compelling historical demonstration of this point in The Mismeasure of Man. Diane Eyer's book is a welcome attempt to explore the realworld implications of this academic theory. It is a theory that is also relevant to other areas of medicine, such as the acceptance of "new diseases" or nutritional doctrines. Studies and assertions that correspond to societal prejudices, values, or wishes are accepted as scientific truth even in the absence of valid and reliable evidence.
Eyer, a psychology teacher at the University of Pennsylvania's Graduate School of Education, maintains in this book that widespread acceptance of
Ziporyn T. Mother-Infant Bonding: A Scientific Fiction. JAMA. 1993;269(16):2146–2147. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500160116047
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: