NOT long ago, hospitals were considered places to die. More recently, with the introduction of modern surgery and medication, hospitals became safe places in which many people obtained substantial benefit. Today, hospitals are perceived from conflicting perspectives. On the one hand, they are places where lives are saved. On the other hand, they are places where enormous amounts of money are spent and the cost-effectiveness of these expenditures is being questioned, and where some "care" provided there is of no benefit or even harmful. These latter perceptions have led some governments to reduce the growth in hospital funding. This, in turn, has led to unnecessary deaths, increased complication rates, and long waits for elective surgical procedures that are performed to alleviate pain and improve functional status. Hospital quality could decline further if changes in health policy do not explicitly attempt to maintain it.1,2
While the perception of the hospital's
Brook RH. Maintaining Hospital Quality: The Need for International Cooperation. JAMA. 1993;270(8):985–987. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510080089037
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: