This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
—In the Original Contribution entitled "Effect of Dialyzer Reuse on Survival of Patients Treated With Hemodialysis," published in the August 28, 1996, issue of THE JOURNAL (1996;276: 620-625), there is a numerical error. The first sentence of the "Comment" section should read as follows: This study of more than 27000 patients with ESRD who began hemodialysis in 1986 or 1987 has demonstrated that, in freestanding dialysis facilities, reuse dialysis using peracetic/acetic acid was associated with a median survival 2.9 [not 1.6] months shorter than single-use dialysis and a median survival 2.2 months shorter than reuse dialysis with formaldehyde.
Incorrect Data. JAMA. 1996;276(21):1724. doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540210032029
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: