[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
August 20, 1997

Proponents Gather to Discuss Practicing Evidence-Based Medicine

JAMA. 1997;278(7):531-532. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550070023012

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


EVIDENCE-BASED medicine, the collection and analysis of evidence that the care a physician provides benefits a patient, is becoming widely accepted even if it is not always practiced.

A number of converging factors contribute to this conclusion, according to those gathered at a meeting last month in Washington, DC, sponsored by a principal provider of practice guidelines, the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR).

But the idea that physicians should be certain that the treatment they give is beneficial dates back to at least the early years of this century. Evidence-based medicine has been defined as a conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of the current best evidence to make a decision about the care of patients.

The more recent factors leading to this acceptance include increasing knowledge about what works and what does not; cost-control pressures that encourage efforts to ensure that therapies are efficacious; growing interest in