[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 15, 1883

A COMPARISON OF ANTISEPTIC AND NON-ANTISEPTIC METHODS IN SURGERY.

Author Affiliations

177 EUCLID AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO.

JAMA. 1883;I(10):292-295. doi:10.1001/jama.1883.02390100004001a

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

[Read to the Section on Surgery and Anatomy, Cleveland, June, 1883.]

On May 20, when the committee were arranging the programme for this meeting, it was found that there was probably no paper that would directly introduce a discussion upon the comparative merits of surgical procedures undertaken with antiseptic precautions and those undertaken without them. At the request of the local Secretary, I have therefore attempted, tempted, in the shortest time possible, to present a comparison of various antiseptic methods with each other, and with non-antiseptic methods.

I think it beyond doubt that, in this country, socalled antiseptic methods are in less favor now than they were a few years ago. This change has become more apparent since the International Congress in London, and depends, to a certain extent at least, upon the favorable statistics produced by Mr. Keith and Mr. Tait in ovariotomy, since they have given up the

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×