This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
[Read to the Section on Surgery and Anatomy, Cleveland, June, 1883.]
On May 20, when the committee were arranging the programme for this meeting, it was found that there was probably no paper that would directly introduce a discussion upon the comparative merits of surgical procedures undertaken with antiseptic precautions and those undertaken without them. At the request of the local Secretary, I have therefore attempted, tempted, in the shortest time possible, to present a comparison of various antiseptic methods with each other, and with non-antiseptic methods.
I think it beyond doubt that, in this country, socalled antiseptic methods are in less favor now than they were a few years ago. This change has become more apparent since the International Congress in London, and depends, to a certain extent at least, upon the favorable statistics produced by Mr. Keith and Mr. Tait in ovariotomy, since they have given up the
ALLEN DP. A COMPARISON OF ANTISEPTIC AND NON-ANTISEPTIC METHODS IN SURGERY. JAMA. 1883;I(10):292–295. doi:10.1001/jama.1883.02390100004001a
Browse and subscribe to JAMA Network podcasts!
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: