This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:
—There may have been some excuse in times past for the public's resorting to the old time spectacle vendor to "get glasses fitted"—at any rate for the larger part of the public, which is unable to pay high professional fees in addition to the expense of costly glasses. Now, however, that the optician has arrogated to himself a would-be professional status, accompanied, of course, with a more or less commensurate fee, the question insistently suggests itself: Should not the general practitioner be able to recognize and manage cases of simple refraction? The answer indisputably must be "yes," for various reasons.First: The main reason for equipping family physicians with a working knowledge of simple refraction is that they may be able to do the medical practice now in the hands of opticians. While complicated refractive cases will often exceed the limitations of a family physician, no medical
Connor L. General Practitioners and Simple Refraction. JAMA. 1909;LII(15):1195. doi:10.1001/jama.1909.02540410043013
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: