[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.191.145. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 24, 1909

Refraction

Author Affiliations

Los Angeles, Calif.

JAMA. 1909;LII(17):1347. doi:10.1001/jama.1909.02540430043014

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:  —"Say nothing but good of the dead" is good advice; yet i feel that the article by the late Dr. St. John Roosa (The Journal, Feb. 13, 1909, p. 543) should be criticized.I do not think that Dr. St. John Roosa was right when he said: "An eye with a moderate degree of hypermetropia without corneal astigmatism, other conditions being favorable, will do its work in a thoroughly satisfactory manner." I often have patients with moderate hypermetropia, without any corneal astigmatism, in whom the general health is good and who yet suffer from severe and intolerable headaches. I recently had as a patient a dental student who had one diopter of hypermetropia without any corneal astigmatism and who was in good health, but suffered from constant headaches that interfered with his work. He was entirely relieved of his headaches by plus 0.75 spheres for each eye.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×