[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
April 30, 1910


JAMA. 1910;LIV(18):1446. doi:10.1001/jama.1910.02550440026003

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


That there is a tendency among the members of the profession studying and practicing different branches of the science and art of medicine to drift apart and to lose sympathy with each other is a matter of frequent observation. The exclusive reliance of the specialist on the journals devoted to his special subject, which the general practitioner does not read, has contributed not a little to this lack of sympathy among the members of the profession. The laboratory man, the experimenter, wrapped up in the problems which he is attempting to solve, fails to keep in touch with the rest of the profession. The surgeon is apt to feel that the practice of medicine is subsidiary to his art. The men practicing the various specialties are each prone to believe that his branch is the pivot about which the practice of medicine revolves. The general practitioner feels little interest in

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview