[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.207.130.162. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 5, 1912

A COMPARISON OF NORMAL AND SYPHILITIC EXTRACTS BY MEANS OF THE WASSERMANN AND EPIPHANIN REACTIONS

Author Affiliations

BALTIMORE

From the Laboratory of the Genito-Urinary Clinic, Johns Hopkins Hospital. Baltimore.

JAMA. 1912;LIX(14):1257-1262. doi:10.1001/jama.1912.04270100027009
Abstract

In the course of some titrations of luetic serums by means of the Wassermann reaction, it was noticed that normal extracts in certain dilutions ceased to fix complement in dilutions of the serum in which extracts from syphilitic tissues gave definite fixation. This observation stimulated us to study more carefully the part played by normal and luetic tissues in the Wassermann reaction, with the hope of throwing some additional light on the much-debated question of specificity.

When the test was first published by Wassermann, Neisser and Bruck, the antigen was thought by these investigators to represent the syphilitic virus, and the reaction that occurred as one between mutually specific bodies, i. e., between antigen and antibody, the resulting combination having the power to fix the complement. The Wassermann reaction was thought to be analogous to the complement fixation test in other infectious diseases, notably tuberculosis, typhoid and gonorrhea. In these

×