[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
February 16, 1889


Author Affiliations


JAMA. 1889;XII(7):230-231. doi:10.1001/jama.1889.02400840014003a

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


The natural odor of the menstrual discharge is peculiar, but not offensive. It is an odor sui generis, and has been compared to that of the marigold (calendula officinalis), fish brine, etc. It is most pungent in women of darker or lighter complexion, e. g., in negro and in red-haired women it is often very strong. Virchow attributes it to the presence of fatty acids. But it is not the peculiar natural odor pervading menstruants that we wish to bring to the attention of the reader. It is the abnormal odor contracted by the flux at or before its emergence from the uterus. To differentiate the two in all cases may become difficult, but the distinction must be borne in mind while endeavoring to make a proper diagnosis.

Every physician of experience no doubt has had—like myself— a number of cases of fetid menstruation—Fluxus Menstrualis Fœtidus—for which I would propose,

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview