[Skip to Navigation]
Article
October 12, 1889

EVISCERATION.Read in the Section of Ophthalmology, at the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the American Medical Association, June, 1880.

Author Affiliations

OF JACKSONVILLE, ILL.

JAMA. 1889;XIII(15):516-518. doi:10.1001/jama.1889.02401110010001b

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

It will be five years in September since Prof. Alf. Graefe, of Halle, delivered his address before the Society of Naturalists and Physicians at Madgeburg in which he described the operation of exenteration or evisceration, and asserted the advantages that it possessed (except in malignant diseases) over enucleation, viz.: that the danger of meningitis was avoided, and that a superior stump was thereby obtained. Besides the denial of these claims, by some it has been objected that the greater degree of pain, and increased amount of inflammatory reaction, together with the prolonged period of healing, were decided disadvantages to be taken into account.

It is not my purpose in this paper to review the arguments of the author regarding the advantages of the method; but first, to offer a consideration relating to the chief objection, that of the consequent pain; and second, to mention an observation which may prove of

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×