[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 19, 1917

ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE "STANDARD BILL" FOR COMPULSORY HEALTH INSURANCE

JAMA. 1917;LXVIII(20):1500-1501. doi:10.1001/jama.1917.04270050202025

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:  —We oppose the "standard bill" for compulsory health insurance:1. Because it is un-American. Americanism means that the individual amounts to something; paternalism, that the individual is nonimportant but that the state is all important. Even a beneficent paternalism is harmful because it destroys individualism and discourages thrift.2. Because it is not demanded by the employees, the employers, or by the physicians who will be compelled to work under its provisions. On the contrary, the employees as represented by organized labor; the employers as represented by the National Association of Manufacturers, the Real Estate Owners Association, the New York Chamber of Commerce, the Board of Trade and Transportation, and others; a combination of both employees and employers as represented by the National Civic Federation; the physicians as represented by the largest and about twenty other county medical societies in this state and the New York State

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×