This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
The Supreme Court of Nebraska holds in the case of the Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Company v. Brady, decided Jan. 16, 1894, that the opinion of a medical expert may be based: 1, on his acquaintance with the party whose condition is under investigation; 2, upon a medical examination of him which he has made; or 3, upon a hypothetical case stated to the expert in court. Some latitude must necessarily be given in an examination of medical experts and in the propounding of hypothetical questions, the better to enable the jury to pass upon the question submitted to them. It is the privilege of counsel in such cases to assume, within the limits of the evidence, any state of facts which he claims the evidence justifies, and have the opinion of experts upon the facts thus assumed.
BASES FOR EXPERT OPINIONS.. JAMA. 1894;XXII(9):318. doi:10.1001/jama.1894.02420880034009
* * SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE * *
The JAMA Network Sites will be conducting routine maintenance from 10/20/2017 through 10/21/2017. During this window access to content and authentication may be intermittently available. The JAMA Store will be completely unavailable during the maintenance window.