This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
All who have given due attention to the progress of the work of effecting the Preliminary Organization of the Ninth International Medical Congress will remember that the sudden and apparently concerted withdrawal of prominent members of the profession, in Philadelphia and two or three other cities, from further participation in such organization immediately after the first meeting of the Committee of Arrangements, which was held in Chicago in June last, was in its terms conditional. Each notice of withdrawal ended in substantially the same language, namely: "as now proposed to be organized."
This language clearly implied two ideas: First, that there was something either in the Rules that had just been adopted by the Committee, or in the personnel of the organization, or in both, that those withdrawing could not sanction. And second, that if such objectionable features were removed, those withdrawing might renew their coöperation. The only Rule ever
THE NINTH INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CONGRESS—WHY FURTHER OPPOSITION SHOULD CEASE. JAMA. 1885;V(22):601–602. doi:10.1001/jama.1885.02391210013004
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: