This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
The literature of glaucoma is honeycombed with doubt and contradiction. If a writer advances a theory of its causation, others demonstrate its inadequacy; if one presents a pathology, another proves it incomplete; if one proposes a plan of treatment, others shortly affirm that they have tried the plan and found it wanting. One cures his cases by iridectomy; another by sclerotomy posterior; another by sclerotomy anterior; another by internal division of the sclerotic at the angle of the anterior chamber; another by division of the ciliary body; another by corneal punctures; another by myotics; others make a selection from these several modes of treatment according to the case in hand. This is a rational method, but as no two make the same selection the seeker for practical directions in treating a case of glaucoma must sift his own data and follow his individual judgment.
If the eye could be taken
CONNOR L. REMARKS ON THE MANAGEMENT OF GLAUCOMA. JAMA. 1896;XXVII(9):480–484. doi:10.1001/jama.1896.02430870028001m
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: