[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.239.151.158. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 4, 1895

DEFENSE OF OPIUM EATING.

JAMA. 1895;XXIV(18):685. doi:10.1001/jama.1895.02430180031009

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Having regard to the attitude of Great Britain in other matters affecting her commercial interests— quarantine, for example—the medical world, outside of the "right little, tight little island," will be inclined to look askance upon the conclusions of the Royal Commission, on the use of opium, just made public. We are told that the inquiry of the Commission was conducted on a wide scale and the decision was practically unanimous; that more than 720 witnesses were examined, including 152 called at the desire of the Anti-Opium Society; that every care was taken to obtain representative testimony, and that the Commission record their conviction that the evidence forms trustworthy ground for the conclusions reached.

And these conclusions are: "That the temperate use of opium in India should be viewed in the same light as the temperate use of alcohol in England. Opium is harmful, harmless, or even beneficial, according to the

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×