[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
July 10, 1897


Author Affiliations


JAMA. 1897;XXIX(2):49-51. doi:10.1001/jama.1897.02440280001001

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


Since the first day of September, 1893, I have treated 124 cases of typhoid fever. The first year I treated twenty-four cases; twenty-one recovered and three died. From Sept. 1, 1894, to March 1, 1897, I treated 100 cases of typhoid fever with one death. Why this great difference in mortality? This is the question I purpose answering for you today.

The first twenty-four cases were treated as the text-books and college professors teach that such cases should be treated. Baths were used where such treatment was practicable, and where I could persuade the patient that a cold bath was a pleasant pastime. The diet was carefully regulated and in the absence of my knowledge of a better drug, sulpho-carbolate of zinc was given. I believed then what was greatly taught on this subject, that typhoid fever was a self-limited disease and that I must carefully watch the symptoms, and

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview