[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 14, 1914

Stethophone, Not Stethoscope

JAMA. 1914;LXII(7):553. doi:10.1001/jama.1914.02560320053034

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:  —Nonchalantly to say that one is wrong is one thing, but to be correct in saying so is fortunately another.In The Journal, Dec. 20, 1913, p. 2260, I offered the word "stethophone" as being a better word than "stethoscope." I gave my reasons for the preference and I thought that I had perused my dictionaries sufficiently to be correct in the matter; but in The Journal, Jan. 3, 1914, p. 57, Dr. A. Rose took exceptions to the word, saying that my dictionary was wrong. He also criticized my use of such hybrid terms as "auriscope" and "dictaphone." As to this, I should like to say that I used these terms to make my point clear: that instruments by the use of which we hear should end in the suffix "phone," while instruments by the use of which we see should end in the suffix "scope."

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×