This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Easton, Pa., Nov. 18, 1905.
To the Editor:
—I regret that an error of statement has crept in the otherwise most excellent synopsis of the report on the Laws Regulating the Practice of Medicine, read by the undersigned at the meeting of the American Academy of Medicine, as found in your issue of Nov. 18, p. 1596. The last sentence, reading: "The report favored having osteopaths represented on state medical examining boards," has its foundation in the discussion of the report. The report made no reference to the personality of a board of examiners. Its contention was that the general law should provide a test for all who wish to practice medicine, under this or that vagary, whether osteopathy, psychopathy, or what not, instead of, as at present, permitting special legislation, or special exemption; that this test should be on certain foundation subjects, and a special and limited license be
McIntire C. Laws Regulating Practice—American Academy of Medicine. JAMA. 1905;XLV(22):1671. doi:10.1001/jama.1905.02510220057014
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: