This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Baltimore, Jan. 16, 1906.
To the Editor:
—I have a clinical suggestion to offer your readers which I have found valuable. It is so simple that it may be a very common procedure, but if so I am not aware of the fact. In the Thoma-Zeiss blood-counting apparatus the lines on the counting scale which may be seen plainly under the microscope when there is no blood on the slide do not always show out clearly when the drop of blood has been covered with the cover slip and the slide made ready for the examination. In accurate work, when a large number of fields are counted, a great deal of time is lost, in the aggregate, in getting the proper portion of the slide under the lens, especially when the higher powers are used. For some time I have used a method which, while very simple, is not mentioned
Browne BB. A Simple Method of Making a Blood Count. JAMA. 1906;XLVI(4):291–292. doi:10.1001/jama.1906.02510310053017
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: