[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
December 12, 1896


JAMA. 1896;XXVII(24):1253-1254. doi:10.1001/jama.1896.02431020035008

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


While the recognition of multiple pregnancy is at times comparatively easy it is at other times extremely difficult, if at all possible with certainty. It will be appreciated that in a given case the diagnosis may be of the utmost importance, as upon its correctness will depend the outcome of the pregnancy, the safe delivery of the product of conception and perhaps also the life of the mother. In a failure to distinguish a duplication of the fetal members the diagnosis may remain undeterminable until labor has begun or even progressed to quite an advanced stage. Pajot contended that the obstetrician could be certain of the existence of twins only when after the birth of one fetus another was found yet in the uterus.

The existence of twin pregnancy is rendered probable by unusual and irregular enlargement of the abdomen, by the occurrence of fetal movements in different parts of

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview