This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
These cases I report, as throwing some light on the philosophy of ventrofixation:
—Mrs. K., age 46. married twenty years; 2-para; youngest child 18 years of age. Seen first in June, 1892. Complained of menorrhagia. Five curettements had been done without much, if any, benefit. Perineum had been attempted by Tait's method which had not given satisfaction. In fact, there was yet a pronounced flatus vaginalis. The first thing I did for the patient was to curette the uterus carefully and pack it with iodoform gauze, and at the same time do an Emmet operation to repair the pelvic floor. The latter was a happy success, in so far as it restored the function of the pelvic floor, but this statement may be questioned, when I admit that it did not raise the uterus as high as its normal place, nor change it from its position in the
HOLMES HR. NOTES ON TWO CASES OF PELVIC SURGERY. JAMA. 1895;XXV(9):350–351. doi:10.1001/jama.1895.02430350006002
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: