[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.183.113. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
November 16, 1895

THE NATURE OF A DELUSION.

JAMA. 1895;XXV(20):864-865. doi:10.1001/jama.1895.02430460030001m

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

My article entitled, " The Essential of Insanity," which appeared in the Journal of October 19 contained an argument supporting the proposition that " where there is no delusion there is no insanity, for the mind that is competent to comprehend facts and their bearings within the scope of its education and the limits of ordinary surroundings is a mind capable of correction on any error; and conversely, a mind that is not thus competent must of necessity beget delusion of one form or another which it is as incompetent to discharge, no matter what the evidence combating."

Since the presentation of that article for publication (last spring) I find in the present autumn number of Brain, p. 328, the following words of Prof. C. Mercier, of London, in his discussion of a paper by Dr. Batty Tuke. Dr. Mercier expresses his gratification at Dr. Tuke's complete acceptance of the doctrine, which,

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×