[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.226.244.70. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
November 16, 1895

The Ohio Cases not Leprosy.

JAMA. 1895;XXV(20):872. doi:10.1001/jama.1895.02430460038010

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

New York, Nov. 7,1895.

To the Editor:  —You published in the Journal, November 2, an article in which Dr. McDougal asks, after describing two cases, "is this leprosy?" In my opinion they are not lepers. I inclose you a letter I wrote to Dr. McDougal.

Dear Dr. McDougal:  —Thanks for your information about the supposed leper cases, and for your article which you were kind enough to send me. I have written my opinion to Dr. Morrow, who had sent me the photograph of the cases. I do not consider them lepers. Colles law, I think, proves them to be syphilitic. Certainly if they were lepers, the mother would have been infected too. Yours truly,

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×