The recognition of a distinct pathologic bearing of many parturient lacerations of the cervix uteri, and the devising of one of the operative procedures for repairing the injury, by Dr. T. A. Emmet, is probably one of the foremost improvements in minor gynecology in the last twenty-five years. And although the Emmet operation is essentially incompetent to meet all the indications in all properly selected and prepared operative cases of this nature; still its name might be fairer had its importance not been overestimated in the beginning; had it not in a large proportion of instances been ignorantly or carelessly pressed into service, where or when no operation whatever on the portio vaginalis was indicated; or if it had always been properly executed. But the Emmet operation is not the only one that has suffered such abuse. Most other procedures upon the cervix or its canal can make equal claims
GOLDSPOHN A. THE PROPER INDICATIONS FOR REPAIR OF PATHOLOGIC LACERATIONS OF THE CERVIX UTERI, AND THE PROPER OPERATIONS TO MEET THEM. JAMA. 1896;XXVI(11):512–515. doi:10.1001/jama.1896.02430630014002d
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: