[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
February 27, 1897


JAMA. 1897;XXVIII(9):426. doi:10.1001/jama.1897.02440090044011

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


Chicago, Ill., Feb. 15, 1897.

To the Editor:  —In the Journal, issue of Jan. 9, 1897, there appeared a part of a serial article on "Massage," written by myself, which was "to be continued." As the continuation did not appear, I wrote to you about February 12 inquiring the reason thereof and received from you the following reply:"Dear Doctor:—I have your letter of February and have to say that after publishing the first part of your article we had a protest from Dr. Douglas Graham, in which he claimed that a large portion of the history of massage was taken from his book, a charge which seems to be sustained, etc."1. Now, as a matter of fact, I did quote Dr. Douglas Graham some and wherever I did I think I gave him credit for it. I did not put his name at the end of each

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview