[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.226.244.70. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 8, 1906

FIBROID TUMORS OF THE UTERUS.A STUDY OF THE DEGENERATIONS AND COMPLICATIONS IN TWENTY-TWO HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-FOUR CASES,† ALSO A STUDY OF FORTY-EIGHT HUNDRED AND EIGHTY CONSECUTIVE CASES IN THEIR RELATION TO CARCINOMA AND SARCOMA OF THE UTERUS.

Author Affiliations

Surgeon-in-Chief, Kensington Hospital for Women, Gynecologist to the Stetson Hospital. PHILADELPHIA.

JAMA. 1906;XLVII(23):1881-1886. doi:10.1001/jama.1906.25210230017001d
Abstract

As early as 1894, as a result of the observation of the clinical history of women suffering from fibroid tumors, I became convinced of the fallacy of the classical teachings concerning the natural history of these tumors. At that time I had operated on but thirty women suffering from fibroid tumors. In the conclusion of a paper read in 1894,1 I said:

The comparatively small number of operations which I have done for fibroid tumors is evidence of the fact that for a long time I was profoundly influenced in my practice by the classical teaching concerning this disease. It was not until my own observations convinced me of the fallacies of the past teaching that I felt justified in resorting to the removal of fibroid tumors except in the worst class of cases. I am coming more and more to believe, however, that it is the part of

×