This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Monrovia, Cal., May 25, 1907.
To the Editor:
—In replying to Dr. Klebs' article in The Journal, April 6, 1907, page 1187, relative to "Rubber Tube Percussion," I prefer to discuss the merits of the question only, as sarcasm has no bearing on scientific truths. I am aware of the fact that I did not enter into a careful discussion of all the minute details connected with the theories of percussion in the short article in which I described the use of the new method. I simply called attention to the method in the hope that other men might give it a fair trial and determine its value.Percussion of the chest by ordinary methods is at best unsatisfactory; and, as practiced by many physicians, is unreliable and worthless. During recent years I have acquainted myself with most of the different varieties of percussion and have compared my findings by
Pottenger FM. Rubber Tube Percussion.. JAMA. 1907;XLVIII(23):1954–1955. doi:10.1001/jama.1907.02520490046014
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.