This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:
—Except as I desire to see The Journal represent the best thought and the highest standard of the American medical profession, I am in no way interested in its place of publication nor in who edits it.I do not know the origin of the agitation to take The Journal to Washington, but I surmise that it arose out of a feeling that some change was desirable.I do not know how much editing the present editors feel justified in performing, nor exactly what is meant by the term "supervising editor " employed by Dr. Reed in his communication in The Journal of March 28, but certainly the "supervision " has been somewhat lax. Doctors are not always good writers, I have no reference to the old illegible prescription story, I mean that they do not always pay much attention to the rules of grammar or composition. And even
Brush EN. Shall The Journal be Removed to Washington? JAMA. 1891;XVI(15):535–537. doi:10.1001/jama.1891.02410670031021
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: