This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Certain local changes are admitted as indicating need of the mastoid operation. If one or more of the so-called vital indications be present, the demand is emphasized. Apart from these, cases are observed where there is room for legitimate doubt before and after operation; before, because there are no distinctive local signs of pent-up secretion, and yet we see phenomena most easily accounted for by assuming that such a condition exists; after, because no pus is found, and even if the patient recovers, doubt intrudes if operation were really needed to effect cure. The following cases illustrate this fairly well:
—John S., age 30, a white laborer, was admitted to the Maryland University Hospital, February 19, 1896. He had been injured the same day by the falling of an embankment. A fractured pelvis was found. He made an uninterrupted recovery for four weeks, when, the evening temperature, normal
WOODS H. THREE CASES OF SUPPURATIVE OTITIS MEDIA; SEVERE SYSTEMIC AND REMOTE DISTURBANCES; RECOVERY AFTER MASTOID OPERATION AND REMOVAL OF POLYPI. JAMA. 1898;XXX(12):655–656. doi:10.1001/jama.1898.72440640023003f
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.