[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.236.170.48. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
November 29, 1902

REPORT OF FOUR CASES OF SYPHILIS MISTAKEN FOR SMALLPOX, WITH REMARKS ON THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF THESE TWO DISEASES.

Author Affiliations

Professor of Diseases of the Skin in the Philadelphia Polyclinic and College for Graduates in Medicine; Assistant Physician to the Municipal Hospital for Infectious Diseases. PHILADELPHIA.

JAMA. 1902;XXXIX(22):1385-1388. doi:10.1001/jama.1902.52480480027001f
Abstract

Of all diseases that protean and imitative malady syphilis is the one which is capable of most closely simulating smallpox. During almost every extensive epidemic of smallpox cases of the former disease are erroneously regarded as variola and are not infrequently sent into hospitals set aside for the treatment of this disease. This resemblance between smallpox and syphilis was noted by physicians several centuries ago. When syphilis was first recognized at the end of the fifteenth century it became necessary to distinguish it from smallpox which it occasionally resembled to a most striking degree. Variola was designated therefore small-pocks or smallpox, and syphilis, great-pocks or pox. (The word pock signified pouch or pocket, and was doubtless descriptive of the pocket left in the skin after the subsidence of the disease.) The same nomenclature was employed in the French language, la petite verole to indicate variola, and la grande verole or

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×