This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
The frequent recurrence in current secular literature, and in halls of legislation, of the agitation against the use of Latin in prescribing and designating medicinal substances has developed a need for a strong expression of the well known advantages of the use of the Latin language in nomenclature.
The pharmacist, because of his familiarity with the methods employed by many physicians, and on account of the large number of prescriptions which annually come under his critical observation, has by far the best opportunity for forming an accurate opinion of the relative value of the methods used in writing prescriptions, and the consensus of opinion is vastly in favor of retaining Latin.
By far the larger number of prescriptions which are now compounded in the United States are written in Latin, but occasionally it will be found that a physician has formed the habit of writing in the vernacular.
REMINGTON JP. PHARMACOPŒIAL NOMENCLATURE, AND THE LATIN OF PRESCRIPTIONS.Read before the Section of Materia Medica and Pharmacy, at the Forty-second Annual Meeting of the American Medical Association, Washington, D. C., May 1, 1891. JAMA. 1891;XVII(17):616–620. doi:10.1001/jama.1891.02410950004001a
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: