[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
March 9, 1901

Fatality of the Rattlesnake.

JAMA. 1901;XXXVI(10):678. doi:10.1001/jama.1901.02470100070017

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


Knoxville, Tenn., Feb. 26, 1901.

To the Editor:  —Your editorial on the "Fatality of the Rattlesnake" induces me to say a word on the subject. The professor referred to therein is manifestly not posted on rattlesnakes. During the past eight years I have had occasion to spend a considerable portion of six winters in Southern Florida. The diamond rattler is a denizen of that region, and since I made my first visit there eight years ago, I know of three men, a horse, and a number of dogs dying from rattlesnake bites. The diamond rattler is said to be the most poisonous of all, and attains an enormous size; fortunately he is usually peacibly inclined, and all he asks is to be let alone.On one of my visits there I talked with an Indian on the subject, and asked him how he cured rattlesnake bites. He very promptly answered:

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview