[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.204.227.250. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 6, 1893

" The Great Patent Regulator," the Code of Ethics (No Pun).

Author Affiliations

San Francisco

JAMA. 1893;XX(18):512. doi:10.1001/jama.1893.02420450020008

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association: 

Dear Sir:  —I have just finished reading the correspondence by Dr. A. C. Simonton of San Jose, Cal., and most thoroughly agree with all he has said in regard to the revision of the Code of Ethics. But I am a little surprised that his logical mind did not mention the illogical position taken by the Code on the subject of patent rights and copyrights.Every one knows that there is but small difference between a patent right and a copyright; morally there is no difference, one protecting the holder in the shape of an instrument, and the other in the contents of a book, consequently it should be equally derogatory to professional character for a physician to hold either. If an individual may, without committing an unprofessional act, protect his writings by a copyright, what law of morals

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×