This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Detroit, Mich., June 11, 1898.
Hon. John B. Corliss, House of Representatives, Washington, D. C.
My Dear Sir:
—Yours of June 10th duly at hand. In reply to the same allow me to say that your "firstly" and "secondly" are but quibblings over terms. So far as the medical profession of the United States is concerned we do not care whether you " introduce" a bill, or "report" it to the House; the effect on the profession, if the bill be passed, remains the same. If you have been unjustly "sacrificed" for doing your " duty," why that is nothing that concerns us as medical men. What we are concerned in is your "doings," whether that be in accordance with your so-called " duty," or in accordance with what your medico-political constituents may wish you to do for them. " Duty," then, as you term it, is to be pitted against the powers that
Leonard CH. Dr. C. Henri Leonard replies to Congressman Corliss, who evidently misrepresents a large number of his constituents. JAMA. 1898;XXX(25):1476–1477. doi:10.1001/jama.1898.02440770044010
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: