[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 5, 1901

LIMIT OSTEOPATHS TO WHAT THEY PROFESS.

JAMA. 1901;XXXVII(14):918. doi:10.1001/jama.1901.02470400042013

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Osteopathy, according to its founders and its advocates, is a system of treatment of disease without drugs, and they have had special laws passed in several states for their benefit embodying this idea. In these it is particularly specified that they are not authorized to administer drugs or to perform surgical operations. It has been urged in objection to these laws that they were only a subterfuge to evade the medical practice laws of the state and that the osteopaths would not confine themselves to the methods they profess to exclusively follow. That this is the case is revealed by the evidence in a recent suit in Denver, Colo., where a female professor of osteopathy sued for services rendered and it came out in the trial that she had not confined herself to osteopathic manipulations, but had prescribed medicines and administered treatment which only licensed physicians are entitled to give.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×