This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Denver, Colo., March 28, 1902.
To the Editor:
—There is an inborn craving in the hearts of medical men for reprints of their articles. The explanation of this universal phenomenon is based on a psychological fact, namely, that every writer wishes to give the stamp of individuality to his work. An article in a modern periodical is like a pin in a stack of hay. That an article nowadays may make a lasting impression upon the reader, it must be an extraordinary production, indeed. The individuality and force of the majority of writings is obliterated in the "crowd." Hence, the writer unconsciously makes an attempt to rescue his production from oblivion by giving it at least the form of individuality. A reprint is an entity, a whole, not a part of a conglomerate.There is, besides, a utilitarian reason for the existence of the reprint. It is a time-saving contrivance,
Spivak CD. Reprints, Whence They Come and Whither They Should Go. JAMA. 1902;XXXVIII(16):1018–1019. doi:10.1001/jama.1902.02480160040013
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: