This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Rockford, Ill., April 10, 1899.
To the Editor:
—Probably more errors occur in subliminal argument through inductive conclusions, from the employment of indifferent or false data than is realized in our common philosophy; conclusions are drawn and made positive from simple parallels or seeming coincidences, and applied in theory as though actual facts; especially is this true where narrow ardor or impoverished avidity seeks to gratify a pretense, or fit a vacuum.In no phase of philosophy is this truer than in the interminable maze of psychiatry where we deal with those attributes which make man kin to Deity and "only a little lower than the angels"; where the border line between mediocrity and madness is as meager and tortuous as the tracks of the sea in a tempest; where Hahnemann was, and Eddy and Dowie are now floundering; and the foam and spray they raise is wrecking by its
Lichty D. A Subliminal Miscarriage. JAMA. 1899;XXXII(16):871. doi:10.1001/jama.1899.02450430025005
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: