This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Dr. Horsley's—we call him Doctor on general principles—report to the registered practitioners of England and Wales, in the British Medical Jornal, August 5, is in some respects interesting reading. It states facts that are not specially creditable to the president and some other officials of the General Medical Council, a body which it would seem from this document has been altogether too much interested in the preservation of abuses instead of reforming them. Appreciating the fact that Dr. Horsely would be a disturbing element in this state of affairs, an embargo was laid by the president on him or any other member having access to documents, and this was supported by a misleading opinion of the legal adviser, and the council therefore supported the presiding officer. This prevented him from discovering and thwarting the scandalous prosecution of Dr. Hunter, which he shows was carried out by the penal committee and
REFORM IN THE ENGLISH GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL. JAMA. 1899;XXXIII(9):553–554. doi:10.1001/jama.1899.02450610055013
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: