This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
We have received many letters complimentary to the index sent out with last week's Journal, and as one of these contains an adverse (?) criticism we publish it.
Buffalo, N. Y., Dec. 30, 1899.
To the Editor:
—The index to the current volume of the Journal is a marvel of completeness, and the Journal itself is now in the extreme front rank. Allow me to suggest that, as it has become so large, it should be divided into three volumes a year instead of two. A volume of 1720 pages is too heavy to handle with any degree of comfort.Alvin A. Hubbell, M.D.We are delighted to receive such criticisms; at the same time we are afraid that it will be impossible to gratify our correspondent by dividing the Journal into three volumes a year. However, we will suggest a partial remedy for the arduous task of handling such large
THE INDEX AGAIN. JAMA. 1900;XXXIV(1):51. doi:10.1001/jama.1900.02460010059014
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: